Obviously everyone can have whatever
Posted: Tue Dec 17, 2024 4:47 am
Dear Reader: This page may contain affiliate links that may earn a commission if you click through and make a purchase. Our independent journalism is not influenced by any advertisers or commercial initiatives unless clearly marked as sponsored content. As travel products change, be sure to reconfirm all details and stay up to date with current events to ensure a safe and successful trip
Venerdì scorso su Chess24.com, during the comment in direct allo spareggio Ding Liren-Radjabov valid for the victory in the FIDE World Cup 2019, Carlsen has responded to a complaint regarding the status of the big step between Fischer and Kasparov. Queste le sue parole: "If the question is whether I think Kasparov or Fischer was greater, I believe that no serious chess player or historian thinks that Fischer is greater in a historical context than Kasparov." or
If the question is who I think was the greatest between india email list Kasparov and Fischer, I think no one, player or scholar, seriously thinks that Fischer was greater than Kasparov in the historical context.
These are certainly words that lend themselves to opposing comments and considerations, but Carlsen never backs down when it comes to expressing his ideas. On the other hand, the “greatness” of a chess player can be measured in so many ways that each of us and our readers can express their opinion. Kasparov expressed his opinion of Fischer both in his book dedicated to the American in the series “My Great Predecessors”, and in a beautiful article published on March 10, 2011 in “the NEOR
the word to you!
OneScacchista
Born in Rome in 1960, I have been an active chess player since 1979 (but perhaps an “internal” chess player for at least 10 years before that). I am a candidate for master at the table, with a career interrupted by a happy fatherhood, and founder of the periodical magazine “Zeitnot”. For some years the fire under the Ashes
Venerdì scorso su Chess24.com, during the comment in direct allo spareggio Ding Liren-Radjabov valid for the victory in the FIDE World Cup 2019, Carlsen has responded to a complaint regarding the status of the big step between Fischer and Kasparov. Queste le sue parole: "If the question is whether I think Kasparov or Fischer was greater, I believe that no serious chess player or historian thinks that Fischer is greater in a historical context than Kasparov." or
If the question is who I think was the greatest between india email list Kasparov and Fischer, I think no one, player or scholar, seriously thinks that Fischer was greater than Kasparov in the historical context.
These are certainly words that lend themselves to opposing comments and considerations, but Carlsen never backs down when it comes to expressing his ideas. On the other hand, the “greatness” of a chess player can be measured in so many ways that each of us and our readers can express their opinion. Kasparov expressed his opinion of Fischer both in his book dedicated to the American in the series “My Great Predecessors”, and in a beautiful article published on March 10, 2011 in “the NEOR
the word to you!
OneScacchista
Born in Rome in 1960, I have been an active chess player since 1979 (but perhaps an “internal” chess player for at least 10 years before that). I am a candidate for master at the table, with a career interrupted by a happy fatherhood, and founder of the periodical magazine “Zeitnot”. For some years the fire under the Ashes