Convergence of national rights through technical standards?
Posted: Sun Apr 06, 2025 7:02 am
Although the technical standardization of products marketed in the European market has already been the subject of systematic and comprehensive legal analyses (first of all H. Schepel, The Constitution of Private Governance: Product Standards in the Regulation of Integrating Markets , 2005), the emerging category of European standards for the provision of services has received much less attention (HW. Micklitz, Service Standards: Defining the Core Consumer Elements and their Minimum Requirements , 2007).
It is precisely on the prospects of standardization in the services market, its interrelation buy phone number list with (private) law, its prospects and its limits that Barend van Leeuwen focuses in his “European Standardisation of Services and its impact on Private law. Paradoxes of Convergence” (Hart, 2017).
The volume, concise and effective, offers an interesting overview of the main attempts to harmonize the provision of services in the single market, framing their legal meaning and the potential harmonizing impact of national laws. The topic is addressed through a heterogeneous methodology, which combines a traditional legal approach with an indispensable socio-legal empirical analysis, without which it would be difficult to bring out the mechanisms and constitutive factors, often not immediately visible, of the policies and procedures for the creation of a technical standard.
It is precisely on the prospects of standardization in the services market, its interrelation buy phone number list with (private) law, its prospects and its limits that Barend van Leeuwen focuses in his “European Standardisation of Services and its impact on Private law. Paradoxes of Convergence” (Hart, 2017).
The volume, concise and effective, offers an interesting overview of the main attempts to harmonize the provision of services in the single market, framing their legal meaning and the potential harmonizing impact of national laws. The topic is addressed through a heterogeneous methodology, which combines a traditional legal approach with an indispensable socio-legal empirical analysis, without which it would be difficult to bring out the mechanisms and constitutive factors, often not immediately visible, of the policies and procedures for the creation of a technical standard.