Well, it hasn't, right? It's all over the place. So there's a need to have a more

[nusaiba124]

comprehensive overview in the reporting, rather than just looking at rankings once a week or something like that. I think the other implication is overreacting, which is a difficult problem for SEOs because we do want to be able to fix things quickly. But I think you have to be clear when you're reporting, is a ranking drop or increase, is it just that keyword? Is it normal for this keyword to go up or down this much? Is this something we should be excited about, because a lot of people are going to think, "Oh, we made this change to the page.


This keyword that we really care about went from 4th t cameroon whatsapp number data o 2nd." Great. Is it going to be back to 4th tomorrow? Is this just random? I think you have to think about it that way. That’s it. Hopefully you found this interesting. Like I said, there’s a link to a deeper level of data below: The Case for SERP Volatility and Daily Rank Tracking — STAT Search Analytics Each section can be linked directly from the homepage, and the UI for each section can be customized based on the content type.




For example, topic clusters can be quickly created in a well-structured Education section. Product Pages for Brand Positioning and Persuasion Product and Solution Pages are noticeably missing from the list of content sections. Product and Solution Pages should be considered SEO-neutral. Marketers can use Product and Solution Pages to build trust and credibility, and ultimately convert site visitors to product demos or free trials. Side note: Limiting SEO focus to product pages can also ease tension with product marketers.